Ramin Reza Rajaii

Explore the portfolio

HomeAboutCVPublicationsMedicineLawAI evaluationAI engineeringWritingTeachingContactConsultingOASIS Substrate by Rajaii Labs ↗
A calibrated microbalance holds a violet glass specimen.

Snorkel AI / Expert evaluation

Evaluating
reasoning.

At Snorkel AI, I wrote 150+ graduate-level medical and legal evaluation tasks and scoring rubrics.

Score a sample answer

Snorkel AI · Expert evaluation

Can you spot the unsupported claim?

At Snorkel AI, I wrote tasks and rubrics for evaluating medical and legal reasoning. Try grading one fictional answer.

Fictional record · original portfolio exercise

Drug A is approved for use alone. No evidence about A with B is supplied.

AI answer
“That proves A is safe to use with B.”
A precision balance with a violet glass specimen on its illuminated pan.
Fictional exerciseWould you pass this answer?

The record says drug A is approved alone. The AI says, “That proves A is safe to use with B.” Does the record support its conclusion?

Original fictional exercise · No client materials
Reveal the full scoring rubric

Recognize the supported fact.

The supplied record supports approval of A alone. An answer earns a positive score for stating that fact accurately and limiting it to the approved use.

Reject the unsupported leap.

No combination evidence is supplied. The answer loses marks when it converts that absence into a positive safety conclusion.

Name the missing evidence.

A stronger answer distinguishes the approval fact from the unresolved question and asks for evidence specific to A with B.

Keep the attribution precise.

My documented Snorkel work involved graduate-level medical and legal evaluation tasks and rubrics. This portfolio exercise is original and illustrative, not a client task or a validated benchmark.

This exercise was written for the portfolio. Client evaluation materials are private.

Distinct roles

Writing the task.
Defining the review.

Snorkel AI

150+ graduate-level evaluation tasks and scoring rubrics benchmarking frontier-model reasoning in clinical decision-making and legal analysis.

Medical and Legal Expert AI Assessment Writer. Private client tasks and downstream benchmark results are not reproduced here.

AI Data Training Hub

Authored the reviewer standards a production legal AI product is graded against: citation accuracy, reasoning-chain validity, jurisdictional correctness, evidence quality, calibrated uncertainty, unauthorized-practice safety.

80+ expert-verified SFT gold responses and RLHF preference items a week, at a 96%+ QA pass rate.

Roles in the full record ↗
Continue reading Regulatory and IP strategy

arrows to moveenter to openesc to close